Long-term outcome of adjuvant radiotherapy upon postoperative relapse of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

Despite that surgical resection is widely regarded as the most effective approach to the treatment of liver cancer, its safety and efficacy upon centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unsatisfactory. In consequence, seeking an integrated treatment, like combined with adjuvant radiotherapy, to enhance the prognosis of patients is of critical importance. By recruiting patients undergoing surgical resection for centrally located HCC ranging from June 2015 to 2020, they were divided into liver resection combined with adjuvant radiotherapy (LR + RT) and mere liver resection (LR) groups. The calculation of propensity score and model of Cox proportional hazards regression were utilized. 193 patients were recruited in aggregation, containing 88 ones undergoing LR + RT, while 105 handled with LR. RT was verified to be an independent factor of prognosis for relapse (HR 0.60). In propensity-score analyses, significant association existed between adjuvant radiotherapy and better disease-free survival (DFS) (Matched, HR 0.60; Adjustment of propensity score, HR 0.60; Inverse probability weighting, HR 0.63). The difference of DFS was apparent within two groups (p value = 0.022), and RT significantly down-regulated early relapse (p value < 0.05) in subgroup analysis. The calculation of E-value revealed robustness of unmeasured confounding. The combination of liver surgical resection with RT is safe and effective towards patients with centrally located HCC, which would notably enhance the prognosis and decrease the early relapse of HCC.

Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of early breast cancer: a disinvestment analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy represents a key component in curative-intent treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients. In recent years, two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are preferred for this population in our organization: electron-based Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and Linac-based External Beam Radiotherapy, particularly Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Recently published long-term follow-up data evaluating these technologies have motivated a health technology reassessment of IORT compared to IMRT. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to simulate health-state transitions from a cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer, after lumpectomy and adjuvant APBI using either IORT or IMRT techniques. The cost-effectiveness from a private health provider perspective was assessed from a disinvestment point of view, using life-years (LYs) and recurrence-free life-years (RFLYs) as measure of benefits, along with their respective quality adjustments. Expected costs and benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported. Finally, a sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness using lower IORT local recurrence and metastasis rates in IORT patients, and if equipment maintenance costs are removed. RESULTS: IORT technology was dominated by IMRT in all cases (i.e., fewer benefits with greater costs). Despite small differences were found regarding benefits, especially for LYs, costs were considerably higher for IORT. For sensitivity analyses with lower recurrence and metastasis rates for IORT, and scenario analyses without equipment maintenance costs, IORT was still dominated by IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: For this cohort of patients, IMRT was, at least, non-inferior to IORT in terms of expected benefits, with considerably lower costs. As a result, IORT disinvestment should be considered, favoring the use of IMRT in these patients.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in comparison to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with HNACC at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to create a matched cohort. RESULTS: In this study, 206 patients were analyzed, with 147 patients (71.4%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 59 patients (28.6%) receiving POCRT. Twenty-one patients experienced local-regional failure. The 3-, 5-, and 10-yr local-regional control (LRC) rate for the cohort were 92.0%, 90.6%, and 86.9%, respectively. In both the entire cohort and the matched cohort, the POCRT group exhibited superior LRC compared to the PORT group (Gray's test, all P < 0.05*). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for LRC (Competing risks regression, HR = 0.144, 95% CI 0.026-0.802, P = 0.027*). In addition, the POCRT group had higher incidences of upper gastrointestinal toxicity and hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia (all P < 0.05*). CONCLUSION: In terms of reducing locoregional failures in HNACC patients, POCRT may potentially offer a more effective therapeutic approach than using PORT alone, although it also entails an augmented burden of treatment-related toxicity.

Clinical characteristics and radiation therapy modality of younger patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, a multicenter study in China's real world.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is a prevalent gynecologic malignancy found in postmenopausal women. However, in the last two decades, the incidence of early-stage has doubled in women under 40 years old. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics and adjuvant therapeutic modalities of both young and not -young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer in China's real world. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at 13 medical institutions in China from 1999 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: young (≤ 45 years old) and non-young (> 45 years old). Statistical comparisons were conducted between the two groups for clinical characteristics, pathological features, and survival. The study also identified factors that affect local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) using Cox proportional risk regression analysis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare the effects of local control between vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) alone and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± VBT. RESULTS: The study involved 1,280 patients, 150 of whom were 45 years old or younger. The young group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of stage II, low-risk, lower uterine segment infiltration (LUSI), and cervical invasion compared to the non-young group. Additionally, the young patients had significantly larger maximum tumor diameters. The young group also had a significantly higher five-year overall survival (OS) and a five-year LRFS. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. There was no significant difference in LRFS between young patients with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer who received EBRT ± VBT and those who received VBT alone. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, young patients had better characteristics than the non-young group, while they exhibited higher levels of aggressiveness in certain aspects. The LRFS and OS outcomes were better in young patients. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. Additionally, VBT alone may be a suitable option for patients under 45 years of age with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer, as it reduces the risk of toxic reactions and future second cancers while maintaining similar local control as EBRT.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America.

BACKGROUND: The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test. RESULTS: Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

Primary and adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma patients from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively access outcome, adverse events and prognostic factors in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Ninety-eight OPC patients were treated between 2000 and 2015. Thirty-three patients received definitive and 65 adjuvant radiotherapy. Seventy-one percent had simultaneous chemotherapy. Patients were systematically followed up (mean 114 months, range 19-197 months). Statistical analysis used Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, and log-rank test. Adverse events were classified according to common toxicity criteria version (CTCAE) 4.03. RESULTS: The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates in the adjuvant vs. definitive cohort were 90.8% vs. 66.7%, 67.4% vs. 33.1%, and 57.7% vs. 16.5%. Survival in the adjuvant cohort was significantly longer than in the definitive cohort (P < 0.00005). Patients <65 years had a significantly longer survival than older patients. Locoregional tumor control rates after 1-, 5-, and 10 years in the adjuvant vs. definitive cohort were 90.2% vs. 66.7%, 82.2% vs 45.4%, and 72.1% vs. 30.3%. Locoregional tumor control in the adjuvant cohort was significantly longer than in the definite cohort (P < 0.005). Distant metastases were diagnosed in 20.4% of all patients. Most patients had mild CTCAE grade 1 and 2 adverse events and mild late adverse events including xerostomia, dysphagia, and lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for OPC is an important part of the treatment algorithm alone and in particular after surgery while the additional benefits of chemotherapy might be age dependent. Despite advanced tumor stages, nearly half of our patients were alive in the long term. The majority of patients had relatively mild chronic adverse events.

Long-term treatment results of conventional and hypofractionation radiotherapy in postmastectomy cancer breast patients: A retrospective study from rural cancer center of Maharashtra, India.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the long-term treatment outcome of conventional and hypofractionation radiotherapy in postmastectomy cancer breast patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 140 postmastectomy breast cancer patients were included in this retrospective study, who were treated from 2012 to 2014 with chemotherapy and various fractionation radiotherapy schedules. Radiotherapy treatment records for study group-I received radiotherapy 4256 cGy in 16 fractions over 3½ weeks, group-II patients received 4005 cGy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, and conventional radiotherapy group-III received 5000 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients from all groups was 60 months (range 9 to 111 months). There were 39 cases with disease failure, 13 (26%) in group I (42.56 Gy), 16 (40%) in group II (40.05 Gy), and 10 (20%) in group III (50 Gy). There were 4 locoregional recurrences (LRRs), two isolated, and 11 distant failures in group I, 3 LRRs (1 isolated LRR) and 15 distant failures in group II, and only one LRR and 9 distant failures in group III. The disease-free survival (DFS) were 74%, 60%, and 80%, respectively, in groups I, II, and III (P =0.044). CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study show that hypofractionation radiotherapy in postmastectomy cases is well tolerated and acute and late side effects are also comparable to conventional fractionation. In our study, locoregional and distant failure seems slightly higher with hypofractionation schedules than in other studies, highlighting the need for more studies with long-term follow-up in postmastectomy patients.

Symptomatic Calcifications after Mastectomy: A Rare Case Report with a Review of the Literature.

Introduction: Symptomatic calcifications of the breast or skin after breast cancer surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy are a rare entity, with only a few case reports published worldwide, reducing the patient's quality of life, whilst asymptomatic calcifications are a common finding on imaging methods. Case presentation: Herein, we present a rare case report of calcifications after mastectomy and post-mastectomy radiation therapy causing chronic inflammation with ulceration and fistula formation, with a two-step surgical approach consisting of excision with linear suture and excision with the reconstruction using a thoraco-epigastric flap. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first publication proving the feasibility of this therapy in patients with symptomatic dystrophic calcifications of the skin or the breast. Moreover, the article provides an up-to-date review of published studies about symptomatic calcifications after breast cancer surgery and radiotherapy with a focus on the time of the clinical manifestation from the radiotherapy and the used radiotherapy scheme.

Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Management.

Extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers that arise from mesenchymal tissues. Hence, the adoption of tailored risk assessment and prognostication tools plays a crucial role in optimizing the decision-making for which of the many possible treatment strategies to select. Management of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy, which has seen significant development in recent decades. Surgery has emerged as the primary treatment approach, with the main goal of achieving microscopic negative tumor margins. To reduce the likelihood of local recurrence, loco-regional treatments such as radiation therapy and isolated limb perfusion are often added to the treatment regimen in combination with surgery. This approach also enables surgeons to perform limb-sparing surgery, particularly in cases where a positive tumor margin is expected. Chemotherapy may also provide a further benefit in decreasing the probability of local recurrence or reducing distant metastasis in selected patients. Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for these rare tumors is best accomplished by an experienced multi-disciplinary team.

Progress in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Management: Surgical and Radiotherapy Approaches.

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), aiming for complete excision, yet the complexity of RPS with its proximity to vital structures continues to lead to high local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Thus, the role of radiotherapy (RT) continues to be refined to improve local control, which remains an important goal to prevent RPS recurrence. The recently completed global randomized trial to evaluate the role of surgery with and without preoperative RT - STRASS1, did not demonstrate a significant overall benefit for neoadjuvant RT based on the pre-specified definition of abdominal recurrence-free survival, however, sensitivity analysis using a standard definition of local recurrence and analysis of outcomes by compliance to the RT protocol suggests histology-specific benefit in well- and some de-differentiated liposarcomas. Ultimately, multidisciplinary collaboration and personalized approaches that consider histological sarcoma types and patient-specific factors are imperative for optimizing the therapeutic strategy in the management of RPS.

Deep-learning-based radiomics of intratumoral and peritumoral MRI images to predict the pathological features of adjuvant radiotherapy in early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgery combined with radiotherapy substantially escalates the likelihood of encountering complications in early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma(ESCSCC). We aimed to investigate the feasibility of Deep-learning-based radiomics of intratumoral and peritumoral MRI images to predict the pathological features of adjuvant radiotherapy in ESCSCC and minimize the occurrence of adverse events associated with the treatment. METHODS: A dataset comprising MR images was obtained from 289 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between January 2019 and April 2022. The dataset was randomly divided into two cohorts in a 4:1 ratio.The postoperative radiotherapy options were evaluated according to the Peter/Sedlis standard. We extracted clinical features, as well as intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features, using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. We constructed the Clinical Signature (Clinic_Sig), Radiomics Signature (Rad_Sig) and the Deep Transformer Learning Signature (DTL_Sig). Additionally, we fused the Rad_Sig with the DTL_Sig to create the Deep Learning Radiomic Signature (DLR_Sig). We evaluated the prediction performance of the models using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The DLR_Sig showed a high level of accuracy and predictive capability, as demonstrated by the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98(95% CI: 0.97-0.99) for the training cohort and 0.79(95% CI: 0.67-0.90) for the test cohort. In addition, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, which provided p-values of 0.87 for the training cohort and 0.15 for the test cohort, respectively, indicated a good fit. DeLong test showed that the predictive effectiveness of DLR_Sig was significantly better than that of the Clinic_Sig(P < 0.05 both the training and test cohorts). The calibration plot of DLR_Sig indicated excellent consistency between the actual and predicted probabilities, while the DCA curve demonstrating greater clinical utility for predicting the pathological features for adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: DLR_Sig based on intratumoral and peritumoral MRI images has the potential to preoperatively predict the pathological features of adjuvant radiotherapy in early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma (ESCSCC).

The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy and regional nodal irradiation after radical mastectomy is defined in high-risk patients with locally advanced tumors, positive margins, and unfavorable biology. The benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk patients (T3N0 tumors) remains a matter of controversy. It has been demonstrated that radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery lowers the locoregional recurrence rate compared with surgery alone and improves the overall survival rate. In patients with four or more positive lymph nodes or extracapsular extension, regional lymph node irradiation is indicated regardless of the surgery type (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy). Despite the consensus that patients with more than three positive lymph nodes should be treated with radiotherapy, there is controversy regarding the recommendations for patients with one to three involved lymph nodes. In patients with N0 disease with negative findings on axillary surgery, there is a trend to administer regional lymph node irradiation in patients with a high risk of recurrence. In patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and mastectomy, adjuvant radiotherapy should be administered in cases of clinical stage III and/or ≥ypN1. In patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast-conserving surgery, postoperative radiotherapy is indicated irrespective of pathological response.

Clinically Significant Dermatitis During Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy may experience grade ≥2 dermatitis. In the Interreg-project HeAT, a mobile application (app) reminding patients to perform skin care will be prospectively tested with the goal of decreasing clinically significant radiation dermatitis. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and risk factors, required for designing the prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of 327 patients with breast cancer irradiated during 2022-2023, the prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and 23 potential risk factors were investigated. RESULTS: The prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis was 31.2%. On multivariate analysis, it was significantly associated with chronic inflammatory disease (p=0.001), significant cardiovascular disease (p<0.001), smoking history >10 pack years (p<0.001), advanced T-stage (p=0.017), normo-fractionation (p<0.001), and radiation boost (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and independent risk factors during adjuvant radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer were identified that contribute to improved patient care and the design of a prospective trial.

[Prevention and treatment of endometrial cancer].

Endometrial cancer is rising in incidence, especially in young women. This rise in incidence has implications for both primary prevention and screening in high-risk population. In the past several years, our understanding of the integration of clinically related genomic and pathologic data optimized the management of endometrial cancer. The updated 2023 FIGO staging includes the histological and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the heterogenous nature of endometrial carcinoma. Standard primary treatment is quite essential, however, selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy remains in controversy. Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer is becoming critical in directing treatment for advanced and recurrent disease, and the addition of immunotherapy to frontline chemotherapy is becoming the standard of care. More attention should be given to increase awareness of survivorship issues and improve patient quality-of-life.

Omission of radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery for older women at low-risk of local recurrence: One option among many.

This editorial discusses the evolving landscape of early-stage breast cancer treatment, emphasizing the need to tailor therapies based on disease biology and genomic approaches. The focus is on the reconsideration of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for older patients with low-risk, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Recent trials show modest long-term local recurrence rates with the omission of RT after BCS in certain cases, challenging the traditional approach. The commentary calls for continued research on predictive tests for treatment response and advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to decision-making, considering factors like quality of life. The nuanced risk/benefit ratio of RT in older patients is explored, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive assessment for optimal therapy.

Update on Dosing and Fractionation for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over 5-6 weeks with daily doses of 1.8-2.0 Gy to a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy is standard of care for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. One exception is myxoid liposarcomas where the phase II DOREMY trial applying a preoperative dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (3-4 weeks treatment) has achieved excellent local control rates of 100% after a median follow-up of 25 months.Hypofractionated preoperative RT has been investigated in a number of phase II single-arm studies suggesting that daily doses of 2.75-8 Gy over 1-3 weeks can achieve similar oncological outcomes to conventional neoadjuvant RT. Prospective data with direct head-to-head comparison to conventional neoadjuvant RT investigating oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles is eagerly awaited.For the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas, RT is not the standard of care. The randomized multi-center STRASS trial did not find a benefit in abdominal recurrence-free survival by the addition of preoperative RT. However, for the largest histological subgroup of well-differentiated and grades I and II dedifferentiated liposarcomas, the STRASS trial and the post-hoc propensity-matched STREXIT analysis have identified a possible benefit in survival by preoperative RT. These patients deserve to be informed about the pros and cons of preoperative RT while the longer follow-up data from the STRASS trial is awaited.

Microcirculatory changes in the skin after postmastectomy radiotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) increases the risk for complications after breast reconstruction. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying this increased risk is not completely understood. The aim of this study was to examine if there is a relationship between PMRT and microvascular perfusion in the skin directly after, and at 2 and 6 months after PMRT and to assess if there is impaired responsiveness to a topically applied vasodilator (Methyl nicotinate-MN) after PMRT. Skin microvascular responses after PMRT were measured on two sites in the irradiated chest wall of 22 women before, immediately after, and at 2 and 6 months after unilateral PMRT with the contralateral breast as a control. A significant increase in basal skin perfusion was observed in the irradiated chest wall immediately after RT (p < 0.0001). At 2 and 6 months after RT, there was no longer a difference in basal skin perfusion compared to the contralateral breast and compared to baseline. Similarly, the blood flow response in the skin after application of MN was stronger immediately after RT compared to before RT (p < 0.0001), but there was no difference at later time points. These results indicate that the increased risk for complications after surgical procedures are not directly related to changes in skin perfusion and microvascular responsiveness observed after postmastectomy RT.

[Updated indications and techniques for immediate breast reconstruction, particularly in the case of adjuvant radiotherapy]. / Actualisation des indications et techniques de reconstruction mammaire immédiate, notamment en cas de radiothérapie adjuvante.

In 2023, 62,000 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer in France. Every year, 22,000 mastectomies are performed. Breast reconstruction (BR) should be an integral part of breast cancer management. Yet the MR rate in France is only 28% within 3 years of mastectomy, of which 14% are immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The number of contraindications to RMI has steadily declined over the last few decades, although some of them remain definitive, such as inflammatory cancer (T4d). Today, many specialists involved in the management of breast cancer consider that IBR can be proposed in cases where adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is indicated, if it is not expected to delay carcinological management. The surgical team must then inform the patient of all available BR techniques. If a team does not offer a particular technique, the patient should be referred to a center that does. In all cases, the proposal for curative and reparative treatment should be the subject of a multidisciplinary discussion involving, in particular, a surgeon, a radiotherapist and a medical oncologist. When adjuvant radiotherapy is indicated, the patient must be informed of the increased risk of complications and deterioration of the aesthetic result. In this indication, RMI by prosthesis is a validated technique. However, if the patient has a history of radiotherapy, autologous techniques should be preferred. In a context of shared decision-making, the choice of whether or not to undergo MR and the type of technique must ultimately be made by the patient, in agreement with the multidisciplinary team.

Application of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One of the most important treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is radiation therapy. Currently, the criteria for administering postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) in SCLC remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of PORT on the prognosis of limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data analysis involved utilizing both random-effects and fixed-effects models for pooling the results. A comparative analysis was performed to assess the prognostic outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who did and did not undergo PORT. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: This analysis included 11 retrospective studies comprising 7694 eligible participants. Among the entire population of LS-SCLC patients, the OS was superior in those receiving PORT than in those not receiving it (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.87; P < 0.0001). In pN0 stage LS-SCLC patients, PORT was associated with a detrimental effect on OS (HR: 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43; P = 0.01). In pN1 stage LS-SCLC patients, additionally administering PORT did not provide a significant OS advantage as compared to not administering it (HR: 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.12; P = 0.21). In pN2 stage LS-SCLC patients, those receiving PORT demonstrated a significant improvement in OS (HR: 0.59; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.70; P < 0.0001) as compared to those not receiving it. Regarding DFS in LS-SCLC patients, the difference in the protective effect with and without the administration of PORT was less pronounced (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.58-1.00; P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to OS, PORT is not advisable in patients with pN0 or pN1 stage LS-SCLC but is highly recommended in pN2 stage LS-SCLC. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.